The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Preoperative Evaluation of Perianal Fistulas: A Cross-Sectional Study on Diagnostic Accuracy, Classification, and Surgical Implications

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Kurdistan Region-Iraq

10.22038/psj.2025.88609.1473

Abstract

Introduction:
Perianal fistulas (PF) present significant clinical challenges due to their complexity and risk of recurrence. This study aimed to evaluate the role of MRI in the preoperative detection and characterization of perianal fistulae.
 Materials and Methods:
A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted at Teaching Hospital-Erbil city-Kurdistan region-Iraq (March 2022–February 2023) involving 59 patients with symptomatic PFs. All underwent preoperative MRI using a 1.5T scanner with T1-weighted, T2-weighted, STIR, and diffusion-weighted sequences. Two radiologists independently analyzed images for fistula type (Parks’ classification), secondary extensions, and sphincter involvement. Findings were compared to intraoperative results. 
 Results:
The most common locations of the internal fistula opening were left anterolateral 16 (24.6%) and left posterolateral 14 (21.5%). The abscess was separated in 10 (15.4%) and connected in 4 (6.2%) of the fistulae. The most common type among males was the inter-sphincteric 40 (87.0%) compared with 10 (52.6%) among females (P = 0.004). The most common type of fistulae among those with no secondary branch was the inter-sphincteric 41 (85.4%) compared with 9 (52.9%) among those with secondary branch (P = 0.011). The incidence rates of separated and connected abscesses were 6 (12%) and 1 (2%), respectively, among the inter-sphincteric fistulae (P = 0.007).
 Conclusion:
The current study illustrates the significant role of MRI in the comprehensive preoperative evaluation of PFs. Given MRI's high accuracy in identifying fistula tracts, detecting secondary branches, associated abscesses, and determining the relationship of the fistula with the sphincter complex, improved surgical planning becomes possible.
 

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Włodarczyk M, Włodarczyk J, Sobolewska-Włodarczyk A, Trzciński R, Dziki Ł, et al. Current concepts in the pathogenesis of cryptoglandular perianal fistula. Journal of International Medical Research. 2021;49(2):0300060520986669.
  2. Sohrabi M, Bahrami S, Mosalli M, Khaleghian M, Obaidinia M. Perianal Fistula; from etiology to treatment - a review. Middle East journal of digestive diseases. 2024;16(2):76-85.
  3. Kawecki MP, Kruk AM, Drążyk M, Domagała Z, Woźniak S. Exploring perianal fistulas: insights into biochemical, genetic, and epigenetic influences—a comprehensive review. Gastroenterology Insights. 2025;16(1):10.
  4. Emile SH, Elgendy H, Sakr A, Youssef M, Thabet W, Omar W, et al. Gender-based analysis of the characteristics and outcomes of surgery for anal fistula: analysis of more than 560 cases. Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro). 2018;38(3):199-206.
  5. Fugita FR, dos Santos CHM, da Silva Ribeiro CO. Epidemiological profile of patients with fistula in ano. Journal of Coloproctology. 2020;40(01):001-7.
  6. Chang CC, Qiao LH, Zhang ZQ, Tian X, Zhang Y, Cheng WW, et al. High-resolution direct magnetic resonance imaging fistulography with hydrogen peroxide for diagnosing anorectal fistula: A preliminary retrospective study. World journal of radiology. 2025;17(1):101221.
  7. Bondurri A. Epidemiology of anal fistula and abscess. Anal Fistula and Abscess: Springer; 2022;3-11.
  8. Lee JL, Yoon YS, Yu CS. Treatment strategy for perianal fistulas in crohn disease patients: The surgeon's point of view. Annals of coloproctology. 2021;37(1):5-15.
  9. Kazemian H, Mehrad-Majd H. Recent advances in the prevention and treatment of chemotherapy–induced cardiotoxicity. Research in Biotechnology and Environmental Science. 2023;2(2):24-9.
  10. Arkenbosch JHC, van Ruler O, de Vries AC, van der Woude CJ, Dwarkasing RS. The role of MRI in perianal fistulizing disease: diagnostic imaging and classification systems to monitor disease activity. Abdominal radiology (New York). 2025;50(2):589-97.
  11. Vo D, Phan C, Nguyen L, Le H, Nguyen T, Pham H. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative evaluation of anal fistulas. Scientific reports. 2019;9(1):17947.
  12. Algazzar HY, Eldib DB, Bahram MA, Zaher NA. Preoperative MRI of perianal fistula evaluation and its impact on surgical outcome. Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. 2019;50:1-10.
  13. Konan A, Onur MR, Özmen MN. The contribution of preoperative MRI to the surgical management of anal fistulas. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (Ankara, Turkey). 2018;24(6):321-7.
  14. Zhao WW, Yu J, Shu J, Sha JT, Li CY, Zeng J, et al. Precise and comprehensive evaluation of perianal fistulas, classification and related complications using magnetic resonance imaging. American Journal of Translational Research. 2023;15(5):3674-85.
  15. Agha ME, Eid M, Mansy H, Matarawy K, Wally M. Preoperative MRI of perianal fistula: Is it really indispensable? Can it be deceptive? Alexandria Journal of Medicine. 2013;49(2):133-144.
  16. van Oostendorp JY, Eddarazi A, Molenaar CBH, Zimmerman DDE, Bemelman WA, Han-Geurts IJM. Mid- and long-term functional outcomes of advancement flap for cryptoglandular perianal fistulas. Techniques in Coloproctology. 2025;29(1):112.
  17. Aly RA, Badr MA, Korayem EM, Abdalsalam OH, Omar H. Role of MRI in classification and preoperative evaluation of perianal fistula. Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. 2024;55(1):141.
  18. Zakaria R, Amin MM, Orban YA, Elfwakhry RM, Alhussein Abo-Alella H. Diagnostic value of trans-recto-perineal ultrasound in perianal fistula—preoperative versus intraoperative findings: A comparative cross-section study. Formosan Journal of Surgery. 2025;58(2):60-6.
  19. Irshad R, Majeed A. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging(Mri) for Perianal fistula tract taking operative findings as gold standard. Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal. 2025;75(1):S16-S9.
  20. Ahmad MW, Shehzadi HS, Dogar IH, Rashid N, Tayyab MA, Qureshi UA, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation of perianal fistula with surgical correlation. Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences. 2023;17(03):230.
  21. Issa SA, Legesse TK, Kebede AG, Worke AB, Buser AA. Clinical and Radiological Features of Perianal Fistula: An MRI-Based Study in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2024;34(1):31-8.
  22. Sanchez-Haro E, Vela E, Cleries M, Vela S, Tapiolas I, Troya J, et al. Clinical characterization of patients with anal fistula during follow-up of anorectal abscess: a large population-based study. Tech Coloproctol. 2023;27(10):897-907.
  23. Akhoundi N, Bozchelouei JK, Abrishami A, Frootan M, Siami A, Alimadadi E, et al. Comparison of MRI and endoanal ultrasound in assessing intersphincteric, transsphincteric, and suprasphincteric perianal fistula. J Ultrasound Med. 2023;42(9):2057-64.
  24. Hagelberg J, Pape B, Heikkinen J, Nurminen J, Mattila K, Hirvonen J. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced CT for neck abscesses: A systematic review and meta-analysis of positive predictive value. PLoS One. 2022;17(10):e0276544.
  25. Sudoł-Szopińska I, Santoro GA, Kołodziejczak M, Wiaczek A, Grossi U. Magnetic resonance imaging template to standardize reporting of anal fistulas. Techniques in Coloproctology. 2021;25(3):333-7.
  26. Elnaim ALK, Wong MP, Sagap I. Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) and secondary overlapping sphincteroplasty from a colorectal perspective: A systematic review. Academic Medicine & Surgery. 2025;1(1):1-11.
Journal of Patient Safety & Quality Improvement
Volume 13, Issue 2
April 2025
Pages 113-120

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics