The Hidden Costs of Convenience: Why Reusing Needles in Healthcare Remains Common Practice Despite Known Risks

Document Type : Short Communication

Authors

1 1aculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

2 Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

10.22038/psj.2025.85290.1457

Abstract

The reuse of needles in healthcare settings persists despite well-documented risks, posing significant threats to patient safety and public health. Studies indicate that reusing needles increases the likelihood of contamination, transmission of bloodborne pathogens, and local complications. This practice is fueled by resource constraints, lack of awareness, systemic inefficiencies, and cultural normalization of unsafe practices. For example, reusing needles in procedures such as Botox injections or repeated IV insertions, while seemingly cost-effective, leads to higher long-term costs due to complications and the need for additional treatments. This paper reviews the risks associated with needle reuse, highlights the factors contributing to its persistence, and explores comprehensive strategies for mitigating these risks. Recommendations include enhancing education and training for healthcare workers, implementing safety-engineered devices, adhering strictly to infection control guidelines, improving infrastructure, and fostering regulatory oversight. By addressing these issues, healthcare systems can promote safer injection practices and ensure the well-being of both patients and healthcare providers.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Bhatia V, Gupta A, Sharma S, et al. Residual contamination and bioburden after reprocessing of single-use endoscopic ultrasound needles: An ex vivo study. Dig Endosc. 2017;29(2):175-181. doi: 10.1111/ 12731.
  2. Pugliese G, Gosnell C, Bartley JM, Robinson S. Injection practices among clinicians in United States health care settings. Am J Infect Control. 2010; 38(10): 789-798. doi: 10. 1016/j. ajic. 2010.09.003.
  3. Recommended practices for cleaning, handling and processing anesthesia equipment. AORN J. 2005;81(4):856-857, 860-870. doi: 10. 1016/ s0001-2092 (06) 60365-7.
  4. Invasive Staphylococcus aureus infections associated with pain injections and reuse of single-dose vials--Arizona and Delaware, 2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012; 61(27): 501-504.
  5. Schaefer MK, Perkins KM, Perz JF. Patient notification events due to syringe reuse and mishandling of injectable medications by health care personnel--United States, 2012-2018: Summary and recommended actions for prevention and response. Mayo Clin Proc. 2020;95(2):243-254. doi: 1016/j. mayocp. 2019. 08.024.
  6. Pugliese G, Gosnell C, Bartley JM, Robinson S. Injection practices among clinicians in United States health care settings. Am J Infect Control. 2010; 38(10): 789-798. doi: 1016/j. ajic. 2010.09.003.
  7. Sikora C, Chandran AU, Joffe AM, Johnson D, Johnson M. Population risk of syringe reuse: Estimating the probability of transmitting bloodborne disease. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31(7):748-754. doi: 10. 1086/ 653200.
  8. Berlanda G, Telo GH, Gossenheimer AN, et al. Impact of syringe and needle reuse on the clinical outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes: A 12-week randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Care. 2024;47(12):2146-2154. doi: 10. 2337/ dc24-0157.
  9. Wareham-Mathiassen S, Bay L, Glenting VP, et al. Injection site microflora in persons with diabetes: Why needle reuse is not associated with increased infections?. APMIS. 2022; 130(7): 404-416. doi:10.1111/ 13230.
  10. Recommended practices for cleaning, handling and processing anesthesia equipment. AORN J. 2005;81(4):856-857, 860-870. doi:10.1016/s0001-2092 (06) 603 65-7.
  11. Popp W, Rasslan O, Unahalekhaka A, et al. What is the use? An international look at reuse of single-use medical devices. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2010;213(4):302-307. doi: 1016/j. ijheh. 2010.04.003.
  12. Siegel JD, Rhinehart E, Jackson M, Chiarello L. 2007 Guideline for isolation precautions: Preventing transmission of infectious agents in health care settings. Am J Infect Control. 2007;35(10 Suppl 2): S65-S164. doi: 1016/j. ajic. 2007.10.007.
  13. Kossover-Smith RA, Coutts K, Hatfield KM, et al. One needle, one syringe, only one time? A survey of physician and nurse knowledge, attitudes, and practices around injection safety. Am J Infect Control. 2017; 45(9):1018-1023. doi: 1016/j. ajic. 2017. 04.292.
  14. Pugliese G, Gosnell C, Bartley JM, Robinson S. Injection practices among clinicians in United States health care settings. Am J Infect Control. 2010; 38(10):789-798. doi:10. 1016/j. 2010. 09.003.
  15. Park JW, Park S, Lee E, et al. Latent factors affecting safer injection practices that can reduce infections and how education can improve them. PLoS One. 2024; 19(10): doi:10. 1371/ journal. pone.0308567.
  16. Schuurmans J, Lutgens SP, Groen L, Schneeberger PM. Do safety engineered devices reduce needlestick injuries? J Hosp Infect. 2018; 100(1):99-104. doi: 1016/j. jhin.2018.04.026.
  17. Kidney International. KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for the prevention, diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of Hepatitis C in chronic kidney disease. 2022;102(6S): S129-S205. doi: 1016/j. kint.2022.07.013.
  18. Pugliese G, Gosnell C, Bartley JM, Robinson S. Injection practices among clinicians in United States health care settings. Am J Infect Control. 2010; 38(10): 789-798. doi: 1016/j. ajic. 2010.09.003.
  19. CDC Grand Rounds: Preventing unsafe injection practices in the U.S. health-care system. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013; 62(21):423-425.
  20. Qaiser S, Arif A, Quaid S, et al. Innovative solution to sharp waste management in a tertiary care hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013; 34(12): 1297-1305. doi:10.1086/673978.

 

Journal of Patient Safety & Quality Improvement
Volume 13, Issue 1
January 2025
Pages 81-85

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics