Patient/client safety structures and processes in home care: A cross-sectional online survey

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Faculty of Pedagogy and Welfare Studies, Department of Health Sciences, Abo Akademi University, Finland.

2 Finnish Centre for Client and Patient Safety, Wellbeing Services County of Ostrobothnia, Vaasa, Finland; and Faculty of Pedagogy and Welfare Studies, Department of Health Sciences, Abo Akademi University, Finland.

3 Master of Health Sciences (MSc), Finnish Centre for Client and Patient Safety, Wellbeing Services County of Ostrobothnia, Vaasa, Finland.

4 University of Turku, Public Health, Finland; and Finnish Centre for Client and Patient Safety, Wellbeing Services County of Ostrobothnia, Vaasa, Finland.

Abstract

Introduction:
The complexity of home care is demanding in terms of patient/client safety. The aim of this study was to explore patient/client safety structures and processes within organizations providing home care during the reform of home care and the supervision of patient/client safety in Finland.
 Materials and Methods:
A cross-sectional exploratory online survey for persons responsible for safety strategies at home care organizations (home nursing, hospital-at-home, home services).
 Results:
The majority of organizations (89%) had a patient/client safety plan, which included central safety strategies and responsibilities. However, the authority responsible for the various dimensions of patient/client safety varied. Regarding responsibility for the supervision of care personnel’s surveys and reports of the hazardous and adverse events, a significant difference was seen between organizations providing both home nursing and social services versus only social services (94% vs. 49%, [CI 34%-64%] p <.001). Patient and client centered measures varied from patient/client service and care consultation processes (81%) to patient/client safety observation rounds (24%). Care personnel were seen to have a function as Everyday safety “watchdogs” or “Safety whistleblowers”, and employ a broad range of preventive and reactive methods for patient/client safety.
 
Conclusion:
Most organizations were seen to have well-established, organizational patient/client safety structures and processes. The methods used to identify, prevent, minimize, and report safety problems were mostly proactive, indicating an active, analytic, and learning safety culture. Current challenges included involving service users and new employees in safety processes to create a truly comprehensive and sustainable safety culture.

Keywords

References

  1. Institute for Healthcare Improvement (2020). Safer Together: A National Action Plan to Advance Patient Safety. Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Boston, Massachusetts. [cited 2022 March 15th]. Available at http://www. ihi. org/ Engage/ Initiatives/ National-Steering-Committee -Patient- Safety/ Pages/National-Action- Plan-to-Advance-Patient-Safety.aspx
  2. George C. National Action Plan for Increased Patient Safety in Swedish Health Care 2020-2024. National seminar on client and patient safety, No harm Centre, Vaasa, Finland, 3 September 2021.
  3. Silverglow A, Lidèn E, Berglund H, Johansson L, Wijk H. What constitutes feeling safe at home? A qualitative interview study with frail older people receiving home care. Nurs Open 2021; 8(1): 191-199. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/ nop2. 618
  4. Schaepe C, Ewers M. “I need complete trust in nurses”– home mechanical ventilated patients’ perceptions of safety. Sc Journ Car Sci 2017; 31(4): 948-956. https://doi.org/10. 1111/ scs. 12418
  5. Schaepe C, Ewers M. “I see myself as part of the team” - family caregivers' contribution to safety in advanced home care. BMC Nurs 2018; 17(1): 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-018- 0308-9
  6. Lindblad M, Unbeck M, Nilsson L, Schildmeijer K, Ekstedt M. Identifying no-harm incidents in home healthcare: A cohort study using trigger tool methodology.BMC Health Serv Res 2020:20(1): 289. https: //doi. org/ 10.1186/s12913-020-05139 -z
  7. Ree E, Johannessen T, Wiig S. How do contextual factors influence quality and safety work in the Norwegian home care and nursing home settings? A qualitative study about managers’ experiences. BMJ Open 2019; 9(7): e025197. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025197
  8. Bien E, Davis K, Reutman S, Gillespie G. Occupational Exposures in the Homecare Environment: Piloting an Observation Tool. Home Health Care & Man 2021; 33(3): 162-170. https: //doi. org/10. 1177/108482232098 6917).
  9. Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. Patient and Client Safety Strategy 2017-2021. Ministry of Social Affairs and Health 2017, Publication 9. (In Finnish). Available at http://urn.fi/URN: ISBN: 978-952-00-3963-9
  10. Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. Health Care Act (1326/2010). [Cited 2022 April

3rd]. Available at https://finlex. fi/en/laki/ kaannokset/ 2010/en20101326

  1. Ministry of Social Affairs and Health (2014). Act Repealing Section 2a of the Social Welfare Act 491/2014. [Cited 2022 April 3rs]. Available at https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/alkup/2014/20140491  (In Finnish).

12.                Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. Act on Private Health Care (152/1990). [Cited 2022 April 3rd]. Available at https://finlex. fi/fi/laki/ ajantasa/1990/19900152?search%5Btype%5D=pika&search%5Bpika%5D=omavalvontasuunnitelma#L3P13 (in Finnish).

  1. Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. Decree of the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health on the Preparation of a Quality Management Plan and on How Patient Safety is Met (341/2011)]. [Cited 2022 April 3rd]. Available at https://finlex. fi/fi/ laki/alkup/2011/20110341 (In Finnish).
  2. National Supervisory Authority for Welfare and Health 2012. Self-monitoring plan. [Cited 2022 March 15th]. Available at https:// www. valvira.fi/terveydenhuolto/yksityisen_terveydenhuollon_ luvat/ omavalvontasuunnitelma_ 2 (In Finnish).
  3. Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. Act on Supporting the Functional Capacity of the Older Population and on Social and Health Care Services for Older Persons (980/2012). [Cited 2022 April 3rd]. Available at https://www. finlex.fi/ fi/laki/ ajantasa/2012/20120980 (In Finnish).

16.                Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. Law on Private Social Services (922/2011). [Cited 2022 April 3rd]. Available at https://finlex. fi/fi/laki/ alkup/2011/20110922. (In Finnish).

  1. Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. Decree of the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health on Private Social Services (1053/2011). [Cited 2022 April 3rd]. Available at https://finlex.fi/fi/ laki/ smur/2011/20111053 (In Finnish).
  2. Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. Act on Organizing Healthcare and Social Welfare Services (612/2021). [Cited 2022 April 3rd]. Available at https://www.finlex. fi/fi/laki /smur/ 2021/ 20210612 (In Finnish)
  3. Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare. Patient safety guide. Tampere: Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare; 2011: Publications 9.
  4. Kurki T, Jylhä V, Kekoni T. (Eds.) Client safety in the social and health sectors. Helsinki: Gaudeamus; 2021. (In Finnish).
  5. Evans EA, Perkins E, Clarke P, Haines A, Baldwin A, Whittington R. Care home manager attitudes to balancing risk and autonomy for residents with dementia. Aging & Ment Health 2018; 22(2): 261-269. https://doi.org/10. 1080/13607863.2016.1244803
  6. Schildmeijer KGI, Unbeck M, Ekstedt M, Lindblad M, Nilsson L. Adverse events in patients in home healthcare: A retrospective record review using trigger tool methodology. BMJ open 2018; 8(1): e019267. https://doi.org/10. 1136/ bmjopen-2017-019267
  7. Dionisi S, Giannetta N, Maselli N, Di Muzio M, Di Simone E. Medication errors in homecare setting: An Italian validation study. Public health nursing 2021; 38(6): 1116-1125. https://doi. org/10. 1111/ phn.12946).
  8. Hardicre N, Murray J, Shannon R, Sheard L, Birks Y, Hughes L, et al. Doing involvement: A qualitative study exploring the ‘work’ of involvement enacted by older people and their carers during transition from hospital to home. Health Exp 2021; 24(6): 1936-1947. https:// doi.org/ 10.1111/hex.13327
  9. Schablon A, Wendeler D, Kozak A, Nienhaus A, Steinke S. Prevalence and Consequences of Aggression and Violence towards Nursing and Care Staff in Germany-A Survey. Int Journ of Env Res Publ Health 2018; 15(6): 1274. https:// doi.org/ 10.3390/ijerph15061274
  10. Hansson A, Svensson A, Ahlström BH, Larsson LG, Forsman B, Alsén P. Flawed communications: Health professionals’ experience of collaboration in the care of frail elderly patients. Scandinavian journal of public health 2018; 46(7): 680-689. https://doi.org/10. 1177/ 1403494817716001
  11. World Medical Association 2018. Declaration of Helsinki – ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. [Cited 2022 April 3rd] Available at https://www.wma. net/ policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/
  12. Andri, S. et al. 2022. DescTools: Tools for Descriptive Statistics. R package version 0.99.45. [Cited 2022 April 22nd] Available at https:// cran. r-project.org/package=DescTools.
  13. Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. Journ of Adv Nurs 2008; 62(1): 107-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648. 2007.04569.x
  14. Pronovost PJ, Armstrong CM, Demski R, Peterson RR, Rothman PB. Next level of board accountability in health care quality. Journal of health organization and management 2018; 32(1): 2-8. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-09-2017-0238

 

 

Journal of Patient Safety & Quality Improvement
Volume 10, Issue 4
October 2022
Pages 131-146

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics