Human Reliability Analysis for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Process in Emergency Medicine Using a Modified Hybrid Method Based on the Markov Model and Fault Tree Analysis

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.

2 MD, Emergency Department, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction:
In emergency departments (ED), human reliability assessment is essential for improving the quality of treatment and preventing medical accidents. A medical accident is expressed as an injury to a patient caused by the negligence of a doctor or nurse who is providing medical care. This study aimed to assess the human reliability in the cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) process and recommend some comments to minimize human errors and improve patient safety.
Materials and Methods:
The main factors in the CPR process (such as rate and depth of chest compression and rate of ventilation) are identified based on the American heart association (AHA) roles. Data were recorded during three months in the evening shifts in the ED and CPR room of Imam Reza Hospital in Mashhad, Iran. In total, 42 samples were collected, and a modified hybrid approach according to the fault tree analysis and Markov method was proposed for the analysis of CPR team (including emergency medicine, medical interns, and nurses) reliability in the resuscitation process. Finally, the important basic events (errors) were selected using the Boruta algorithm by R software.
Results:
An FTA-Markov-based hybrid method is considered to compute the human reliability in the CPR process. The obtained results from human reliability analysis using the sensitivity analysis via Boruta algorithm and the proposed hybrid method show that an interrupt between chest compression process for rhythm control, the cycle of CPR, the depth of chest compression, and the discussion about reversible causes are the most effective factors in the human reliability of CPR process.
Conclusion:
The human reliability of the CPR process in the ED has been assessed using a hybrid method based on the FTA and Markov method for the first time. To improve the quality of treatment and prevent medical accidents during the CPR process, the main factors in the process are identified, and then, the proposed hybrid method is used to calculate human reliability.

Keywords

References

  1. Carayon, P., and Wood, K. E. Patient safety. Information Knowledge Systems Management, 2009; 8: 23-46. https://doi.org/10.3233/IKS-2009-0134.
  2. Kohn, L. T., Corrigan, J. M., and Donaldson, M. S. Errors in health care: a leading cause of death and injury. To err is human: Building a safer health system. Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. 2000; 26-48. https://doi.org/10.17226/9728.
  3. Antino, M., Sanchez-Manzanares, M. and Ortega, A., The hospital survey on patient safety culture in Mexican hospitals: Assessment of psychometric properties. Safety Science, 2020; 128: 104706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ssci. 2020.104706.
  4. Grespan, L., Fiorini, P., and Colucci, G., Patient Safety in Robotic Surgery. The Route to Patient Safety in Robotic Surgery. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, Springer, Cham, 2019; 126: 7-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03020-9_2.
  5. Newman-Toker, D. E., and Pronovost, P. J. Diagnostic errors—the next frontier for patient safety. JAMA, 2009; 301(10): 1060-1062. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.249.
  6. Woodhouse, S., Burney, B., and Coste, K., To err is human: improving patient safety through failure mode and effect analysis. Clinical leadership and management review: the journal of CLMA, 2004; 18(1): 32-36. Pubmed.gov, PMID: 14968751.
  7. Koricke, M.W. and Scheid, T.L. Coercive Conformity: Does Mandated Reporting of Hospital Errors Improve Patient Safety?, Kronenfeld, J.J. (Ed.) Race, Ethnicity, Gender and Other Social Characteristics as Factors in Health and Health Care Disparities,Research in the Sociology of Health Care, Emerald Publishing Limited, 2020; 38: 145-161.  https://doi.org/ 10.1108/S0275495920200000038021.
  8. Wijaya, M.I., Mohamad, A.R. and Hafizurrachman, M, Shift schedule realignment and patient safety culture, International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 2020; 33(2): 145-157. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHCQA-04-2019-0080.
  9. Cohen, T. N., Francis, S. E., Wiegmann, D. A., Shappell, S. A., and Gewertz, B. L., Using HFACS-Healthcare to Identify Systemic Vulnerabilities During Surgery. American Journal of Medical Quality, 2018; 33(6): 614-622. https://doi.org /10. 1177/1062860618764316.
  10. Bleetman, A., Sanusi, S., Dale, T., and Brace, S. Human factors and error prevention in emergency medicine. Emergency Medicine Journal (EMJ), 2012; 29(5): 389-393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emj.2010.107698.
  11. Schenkel, S., Promoting patient safety and preventing medical error in emergency departments. Academic Emergency Medicine, 2000; 7(11): 1204-1222. https://doi.org/10. 1111/j. 1553-2712. 2000.tb00466.x.
  12. Croskerry, P., and Douglas, S., Emergency medicine: a practice prone to error? . Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2001; 3(4): 271-276. https://doi.org/10. 1017/ S1481803500005765.
  13. Croskerry, P., Marc, S., Sam, C., LeBlanc, C., Douglas, S., Patty, W., and Michael, M., Profiles in patient safety: medication errors in the emergency department. Academic Emergency Medicine, 2004; 11(3): 289-299. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2004.tb02214.x.
  14. Kiymaz, D., and Zeliha, K., Identification of factors which affect the tendency towards and attitudes of emergency unit nurses to make medical errors. Journal of clinical nursing, 2018; 27(5-6): 1160-1169. https://doi.org/10. 1111/ jocn.14148.
  15. Flannery, A. H., and Parli, S. E. Medication errors in cardiopulmonary arrest and code-related situations. American Journal of Critical Care, 2016; 25(1): 12-20. https://doi.org/10. 4037/ajcc2016190.
  16. Thiagarajan, R. R., Bird, G. L., Harrington, K., Charpie, J. R., Ohye, R. C., Steven, J. M., Epstein, M., Laussen, P. C., Improving safety for children with cardiac disease. Cardiology in the Young, 2007; 17(S4): 127-132. https://doi.org/10. 1017/ S1047951107001230.
  17. Bell, B. J., and Swain, A. D. Procedure for conducting a human-reliability analysis for nuclear power plants, Final report. United States: N. p. 1983.  https://doi.org/10.2172/5870353.
  18. TAN, Z.-d., and YU, J.-x., Quantitative Analysis of Human Reliability in Ocean Shipping System. School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China, Ocean Technology. 2005.
  19. Kim, Y.-C., Jung, H.-W., and Bae, C.-H., Prevention of human error in shipbuilding industry. Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 2011; 30(1): 127-135. https:// doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2011.30.1.127.
  20. Rahman, F. A., Varuttamaseni, A., Michael, K.-M., and Lee, J. C., Application of fault tree analysis for customer reliability assessment of a distribution power system. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2013; 111: 76-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2012.10.011.
  21. Martins, M. R., and Maturana, M. C., Application of Bayesian Belief networks to the human reliability analysis of an oil tanker operation focusing on collision accidents. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2013; 110: 89-109. https://doi. org/10.1016/ j.ress.2012.09.008.
  22. Kumar, P., Gupta, S. and Gunda, Y.R., Estimation of human error rate in underground coal mines through retrospective analysis of mining accident reports and some error reduction strategies. Safety science, 2020; 123: 104555. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.ssci. 2019. 104555.
  23. Hogenboom, I., and Kristensen, A. S., Comparison of Human Reliability Analysis Method. Master’s Thesis. Aalborg University Esbjerg. 2018.
  24. Cai, B., Kong, X., Liu, Y., Lin, J., Yuan, X., Xu, H., and Ji, R., Application of Bayesian networks in reliability evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2018; 15(4): 2146-2157. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2018.2858281.
  25. Sujan, M. A., Embrey, D., and Huang, H., On the application of human reliability analysis in healthcare: opportunities and challenges. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2020; 194: 106189. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j. ress.2018.06.017.
  26. Foster, J. D., Miskovic, D., Allison, A. S., Conti, J. A., Ockrim, J., Cooper, E. J., Hanna, G. B., Francis, N. K., Application of objective clinical human reliability analysis (OCHRA) in assessment of technical performance in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Techniques in coloproctology, 2016; 20(6): 361-367. https://doi.org/10. 1007/ s10151-016-1444-4.
  27. Chadwick, L., and Fallon, E. F. Human reliability assessment of a critical nursing task in a radiotherapy treatment process. Applied ergonomics, 2012; 43(1): 89-97. https:// doi.org/ 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.03.011.
  28. Hsieh, M.-c., Wang, E. M.-y., Lee, W.-c., Li, L.-w., Hsieh, C.-y., Tsai, W., Wang, C.P., Huang, J.L. and Liu, T.C., Application of HFACS, fuzzy TOPSIS, and AHP for identifying important human error factors in emergency departments in Taiwan. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2018; 67: 171-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ergon.2018.05.004.
  29. Dhillon, B. S. Methods for performing human reliability and error analysis in health care. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 2003; 16(6): 306-317. https:// doi.org/10.1108/09526860310495697.
  30. Andeweg, C. S., Groenewoud, J., Wilt, G. J., Goor, H. v., and Bleichrodt, R. P. A Markov decision model to guide treatment of recurrent colonic diverticulitis. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2016; 14(1): 87-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2015.02.040.
  31. Zixian, L., Ni Xin, L. Y., Qinglu, S., and Yukun, W., Gastric esophageal surgery risk analysis with a fault tree and Markov integrated model. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2011;  96(12): 1591-1600. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j. ress.2011.08.004.
  32. Xing, L., and Amari, S. V., Fault tree analysis. Handbook of performability engineering. London: Springer, 2008; 595-620. https: //doi.org/10. 1007/978-1-84800-131-2_38.
  33. Ross, S. M., Markov chain, Introduction to probability models, Eleventh Edition, Academic press. 2014; 191-192. https://doi.org/10. 1016/B978-0-12-407948-9.00013-X.
  34. Link, M. S., Berkow, L. C., Kudenchuk, P. J., Halperin, H. R., Hess, E. P., Moitra, V. K., Neumar, R. W., O'Neil, B. J., Paxton, J. H., Silvers, S. M., White, R. D., Yannopoulos, D., Donnino, M. W., Part 7: adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2015 American Heart Association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. 2015; 132(18): S444-S464. https: //doi. org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000261.        

 

 

 

 

Journal of Patient Safety & Quality Improvement
Volume 9, Issue 3
July 2021
Pages 163-175

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics