Journal of Patient Safety & Quality Improvement

Journal of Patient Safety & Quality Improvement

Contextual factors interfacing with quality of care in the emergency department: A micro-ethnographic study

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Amir Mirhaghi 1
Mohsen Ebrahimi 2
Mohsen Noghani-Dokht-Bahmani 3
Abbas Heydari 4
1 Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
2 Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
3 Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Letters and Humanities, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
4 Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
10.22038/psj.2019.40868.1231
Abstract
Introduction: Triage in the interactive atmosphere of the emergency department (ED) has been described as complex and challenging. The influence of nurses’ belief systems on triage decision making has not to the authors’ knowledge been addressed. This study attempted to gain an understanding of the ED nurses’ culture of practice with respect to contextual factors that affect triage decision making.
Methods: A focused micro-ethnographic study based on Spradley’s developmental research sequence (DRS) has been conducted in the emergency department of the Mashhad University hospital, Iran, from February 2014 to February 2015. Data were collected during 300 hours of participant observations that were accompanied by formal and informal interviews, then analyzed based on Spradley’s DRS.
Results: Nine study participants were formally interviewed. From these interviews, eight core beliefs emerged related to nurses’ culture of practice: namely, triage decision making is arbitrary; the facility/locale of the emergency medicine department is the pivotal contextual factor affecting decision making; not every nurse can be assigned to triage; each patient assumes the existence of an emergency condition; the on-duty physician must be known; triage decision making must be considered plausible by colleagues; “they” tell us something, we should do something else; and triage guidelines are not practical.
Conclusion: Contextual factors have a strong tendency to guide triage decision making and violate the principle of patient acuity (that is, that patients with the most acute medical conditions should be prioritized). In response, triage guidelines need to integrate the priorities of patients, nurses, physicians, and administrators.
Keywords
Contextual factors
Emergency
Ethnography
Triage
  1. Mirhaghi A, Heydari A, Ebrahimi M, Noghani Dokht Bahmani M. Nonemergent Patients in the Emergency Department: An Ethnographic Study. Trauma Mon. 2016; In Press(In Press):e23260.
  2. Ebrahimi M, Mirhaghi A, Mazlom R, Heydari A, Nassehi A, Jafari M. The Role Descriptions of Triage Nurse in Emergency Department: A Delphi Study. Scientifica (Cairo). 2016;2016:5269815. doi: 10.1155/2016/. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
  3. Farrohknia N, Castrén M, Ehrenberg A, Lind L, Oredsson S, Jonsson H, et al. Emergency department triage scales and their components: a systematic review of the scientific evidence. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011; 19(42):1-13.
  4. Ebrahimi M, Heydari A, Mazlom R, Mirhaghi A. Reliability of the Australasian Triage Scale: Meta-analysis. World J Emerg Med. 2015; 6(2):94-9.
  5. Mirhaghi A, Heydari A, Mazlom R, Hasanzadeh F. Reliability of the Emergency Severity Index: Meta-analysis. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2015 15(1):e71-7. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
  6. Gerdtz M, Chu M, Collins M, Considine J, Crellin D, Sands N, et al. Factors influencing consistency of triage using the Australasian Triage Scale: implications for guideline development. Emerg Med Australas. 2009 21(4): 277-85. doi: 10.1111/j.742-6723. 2009. 01197.x.
  7. Stanfield L. Clinical Decision Making in Triage: An Integrative Review. J Emerg Nurs. 2015:pii: S0099-1767(15)00081-1. doi: 10. 1016/ j. jen.2015.02.003.
  8. Fonteyn M, Ritter B. Clinical reasoning in nursing. Higgs J, Jones M, editors. Oxford: Butterworth Heinmann; 2000
  9. Gerdtz M, Bucknall T. Triage nurses' clinical decision making. An observational study of urgency assessment. J Adv Nurs. 2001 35(4): 550-61.
  10. Dadashzadeh A, Abdollahzadeh F, Rahmani A, Lotfi M, Ghojazadeh M. Factors affecting triage decision-making from the viewpoints of emergency ward staff in Tabriz hospitals. IJCCN. 2014;6(4):261-6.
  11. Ramacciati N, Ceccagnoli A, Addey B. Violence against nurses in the triage area: An Italian qualitative study. Int Emerg Nurs. 2015 pii: S1755-599X(15)00013-0. doi:10. 1016/j. ienj. 2015.02.004. .
  12. Chung JY. An exploration of accident and emergency nurse experiences of triage decision making in Hong Kong. Accid Emerg Nurs. 2005;13(4):206-13.
  13. Andersson A, Omberg M, Svedlund M. Triage in the emergency department--a qualitative study of the factors which nurses consider when making decisions. Nurs Crit Care. 2006; 1(3):136-45.
  14. Göransson K, von Rosen A. Patient experience of the triage encounter in a Swedish emergency department. Int Emerg Nurs. 2010 18(1):36-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2009.10.001. Epub  Nov 14.
  15. Fry M. An ethnography: Understanding emergency nursing practice belief systems. Int Emerg Nurs. 2012;20(3):120-5.
  16. Person J, Spiva L, Hart P. The culture of an emergency department: an ethnographic study. Int Emerg Nurs. 2013;21(4):222-7.
  17. Fry M, Burr G. Current triage practice and influences affecting clinical decision-making in emergency departments in NSW, Australia. Accid Emerg Nurs. 2001;9(4):227-34.
  18. Aacharya RP, Gastmans C, Denier Y. Emergency department triage: an ethical analysis. BMC Emerg Med. 2011;11(1):16.
  19. Khorgami Z, Gougol AH, Soroush A. Causes of deceptive non-admission to the emergency department: personnel's point of view. Iranian Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine. 2012;5(3):81-90.
  20. Rosenbaum S, Cartwright-Smith L, Hirsh J, Mehler PS. Case studies at Denver Health:‘patient dumping’in the emergency department despite EMTALA, the law that banned it. Health Affairs. 2012;31(8):1749-56.
  21. Van der Geest S, Finkler K. Hospital ethnography: introduction. Soc Sci Med. 2004 59(10):1995-2001.
  22. Spradley J. Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston; 1980.
  23. Parfitt B. Using Spradley: an ethnosemantic approach to research. J Adv Nurs. 1996;24(2):341-9.
  24. Smith M, Lisabeth L, Bonikowski F, Morgenstern L. The role of ethnicity, sex, and language on delay to hospital arrival for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2010 41(5):905-9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.578112. Epub 2010 Mar 25.
  25. Arslanian-Engoren C. Gender and age bias in triage decisions. J Emerg Nurs. 2000 26(2):117-24.
  26. American Anthropological Association. AAA Ethics Blog [Internet]: The Council of the American Anthropological Association. 2012.
  27. Quinlan M. Considerations for collecting freelists in the field: examples from ethobotany. Field Methods. 2005;17(3):219-34.
  28. Spradley J. The Ethnographic Interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston; 1979.
  29. Smith JJ. Using ANTHOPAC 3.5 and a spreadsheet to compute a free-list salience index. Field Methods. 1993;5(3):1-3.
  30. Krefting L. Rigor in Qualitative Research: The Assessment of Trustworthiness. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 1991; 45(3): 214-22.
  31. Ploeg J, Davies B, Edwards N, Gifford W, Miller P. Factors influencing best-practice guideline implementation: lessons learned from administrators, nursing staff, and project leaders. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2007;4(4):210-9.
  32. Mirhaghi A. Triage system should be compatible with culture of care in emergency department. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2016;111(2):138-9.
  33. Durand A-C, Gentile S, Devictor B, Palazzolo S, Vignally P, Gerbeaux P, et al. ED patients: how nonurgent are they? Systematic review of the emergency medicine literature. Am J Emerg Med. 2011;29(3):333-45.
  34. Uscher-Pines L, Pines J, Kellermann A, Gillen E, Mehrotra A. Emergency department visits for nonurgent conditions: systematic literature review. Am J Manag Care. 2013; 19(1): 47-59.
  35. Vertesi L. Does the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale identify non-urgent patients who can be triaged away from the emergency department? CJEM. 2004; 6(5): 337-42.
  36. Afilalo J, Marinovich A, Afilalo M, Colacone A, Leger R, Unger B, et al. Nonurgent emergency department patient characteristics and barriers to primary care. Acad Emerg Med. 2004;11(12):1302-10.
  37. Lowe RA, Bindman AB. Judging who needs emergency department care: a prerequisite for policy-making. Am J Emerg Med. 1997;15(2):133-6.
  38. Bergeron S, Gouin S, Bailey B, Patel H. Comparison of triage assessments among pediatric registered nurses and pediatric emergency physicians. Acad Emerg Med. 2002 9(12): 1397-401.
  39. Allan H, Odelius A, Hunter B, Bryan K, Knibb W, Shawe J. Gatekeeping access to the midwifery unit: Managing complaints by bending the rules. Health (London). 2015;19(6):652-69.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

Journal of Patient Safety & Quality Improvement
Volume 7, Issue 4
Autumn 2019
Pages 145-154