The Neurosurgical Registrar – are we still as busy as we were? A Quality Improvement Study

Document Type: Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Wales, United Kingdom.

2 Clinical Lecturer in Neurosurgery, Neuroscience and Mental Health Research Institute, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park,United Kingdom

3 Consultant Neurosurgeon, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, United Kingdom

Abstract

Introduction: Bleeps represent an important element of the on-call neurosurgical registrar’s workday. They provide instant contact between healthcare staff, while allowing doctors to perform tasks across the hospital. However the paging system causes interruptions and can interfere with patient care. We aim to develop and implement strategies to improve paging patterns and ultimately reduce unnecessary calls.

Material and Methods: we conducted a retrospective analysis of electronic hospital bleep records over a 7-months period (March-September-2015) in which bleep logs were retrieved from the hospital paging system at University Hospital of Wales. The first cycle was followed by a set of interventions followed by a second data-collection cycle 12 months later.
Results: The first cycle showed that on average the neurosurgical registrar received 57 bleeps per 24hrs. Almost a third of on-call bleeps were new referrals received from the local accident & emergency department or from other district hospitals. Other calls were received from our own hospital’s wards and Intensive Therapeutic Unit (10%), the paediatric ward (5%), neurosurgical theatres (5%) and emergency theatre (5%). The second cycle showed a 23% drop in the total number of bleeps compared to first cycle. The difference in bleep numbers was evident during the day shift, and no difference was noted during the night shift. No difference in the number of new referrals was noted.
Conclusion: This project has shown that a simple change can result in a significant improvement. It also confirmed the value of team work and communication in improving quality of care.

Keywords


1. Bhaduri M, Bew D. Quality improvement project on the acute surgical house-officer bleep. Int J Surg.2015;23(1):S102.
2. Ibrahim W, Lin S. Reducing time spent by junior doctors on call performing routine tasks at weekends. BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2013;2(1):u200359.w932.
3. Brady AM, Byrne G, Quirke MB, Lynch A, Ennis S,Bhangu J, et al. Barriers to effective, safe communication and workflow between nurses and non-consultant hospital doctors during out-ofhours. Int J Qual Health Care. 2017; 29(7): 929-34.
4. Chisholm CD, Collison EK, Nelson DR, Cordell WH.Emergency department workplace interruptions are emergency physicians “interrupt‐Driven” and “multitasking”? Acad Emerg Med. 2000; 7(11):1239-43.
5. Agarwal R, Sands DZ, Schneider JD. Quantifying the economic impact of communication inefficiencies in U.S. hospitals. J Healthc Manag. 2010; 55(4):265-81.
6. Beary E. Appropriateness of bleeps: an audit of the bleep system over two week period. Irish Med J.2012; 105(7):249-50.
7. Thomas J, Davies C. The nursing shortage and the scope for reducing it by redefining their role.Health Serv Manage Res. 2005; 18(4):217-22.
8. Blum NJ, Lieu TA. Interrupted care. The effects of paging on paediatric resident activities. Am J Dis Child. 1992; 146(7):806-8.
9. Menon R, Rivett C. Time-motion analysis examining of the impact of Medic Bleep, an instant messaging platform, versus the traditional pager: a prospective pilot study. Digit Health. 2019; 5:2055207619831812.
10. Lingard L, Espin S, Whyte S, Regehr G, Baker GR, Reznick R, et al. Communication failures in the operating room: an observational classification of recurrent types and effects. Qual Saf Health Care.2004; 13(5):330-4.
11. Weiner BJ, Alexander JA, Shortell SM, Baker LC,Becker M, Geppert JJ. Quality improvement implementation and hospital performance on quality indicators. Health Serv Res. 2006; 41(2):307-34.
12. Guttman OT, Lazzara EH, Keebler JR, Webster KL, Gisick LM, Baker AL. Dissecting communication barriers in healthcare: a path to enhancing communication resiliency, reliability, and patient safety. J Patient Saf. 2018; 10:41.
13. Nagpal K, Vats A, Lamb B, Ashrafian H, Sevdalis N, Vincent C, et al. Information transfer and communication in surgery: a systematic review.Ann Surg. 2010; 252(2):225-39.
14. Nagpal K, Arora S, Vats A, Wong HW, Sevdalis N,Vincent C, et al. Failures in communication and information transfer across the surgical care pathway: interview study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21(10):843-9.
15. Iversen TB, Melby L, Toussaint P. Instant messaging at the hospital: supporting articulation work? Int J Med Inform. 2013; 82(9):753-61.
16. Wu RC, Morra D, Quan S, Lai S, Zanjani S, Abrams H, et al. The use of smartphones for clinical communication on internal medicine wards. J Hosp Med. 2010; 5(9):553-9.
17. Joseph B, Pandit V, Khreiss M, Aziz H, Kulvatunyou N, Tang A, et al. Improving communication in level 1
trauma centers: replacing pagers with smartphones.Telemed J E Health. 2013; 19(3):150-4.
18. Haroon M, Yasin F, Eckel R, Walker F. Perceptions and attitudes of hospital staff toward paging system and the use of mobile phones. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2010; 26(4):377-81.
19. Martin G, Janardhanan P, Withers T, Gupta S. Mobile revolution: a requiem for bleeps? Postgrad Med J. 2016; 92 (1091):493-6.
20. Patel RK, Sayers AE, Patrick NL, Hughes K, Armitage J, Hunter IA. A UK perspective on smartphone use amongst doctors within the surgical profession.Ann Med Surg. 2015; 4(2):107-12.
21. Mobasheri MH, King D, Johnston M, Gautama S, Purkayastha S, Darzi A. The ownership and clinical use of smartphones by doctors and nurses in the UK: a multicentre survey study. BMJ Innov. 2015;1(4):174-81.
22. Morgan L, Hadi M, Pickering S, Robertson E, Griffin D, Collins G, et al. The effect of teamwork training on team performance and clinical outcome in elective orthopaedic surgery: a controlled interrupted time series study. BMJ Open. 2015;5(4):e006216.